Back to Yogi Adityanath
Dismissedcriminal Filed 2007 Allahabad High Court / Uttar Pradesh Government

Gorakhpur Riots Incitement Case (2007)

Case against Yogi Adityanath — Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh

Case Overview

In 2007, Yogi Adityanath was accused of inciting communal riots in Gorakhpur. He was arrested and various charges under the IPC were filed. The case was later withdrawn by the state government once he became Chief Minister, sparking controversy.

Detailed Background

The Gorakhpur riots of 2007 saw Yogi Adityanath, then a Member of Parliament, arrested on charges of inciting violence, promoting enmity between groups, and other sections of the Indian Penal Code. The catalyst for the unrest was the death of a Hindu youth, leading to retaliatory actions. Adityanath was accused of making inflammatory speeches that allegedly fueled the communal tensions. Following his arrest, a series of protests and clashes erupted in the region. The case remained active for several years. However, a significant development occurred in 2017 when the Uttar Pradesh government, led by Adityanath himself, initiated the process to withdraw the case. This decision drew considerable criticism from opposition parties and civil rights activists, who questioned the ethical implications of a chief minister withdrawing cases against himself. The Allahabad High Court later dismissed a petition challenging the government's decision, citing procedural irregularities in the filing of the petition and affirming the state's power to withdraw cases under Section 321 of the CrPC. Critics argued that the withdrawal undermined justice and raised concerns about political interference in legal processes, while the government maintained the withdrawal was based on legal advice and procedural correctness.

Charges / Allegations

Allegations of inciting riots, promoting enmity between different groups, and various sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Current Status / Outcome

The Uttar Pradesh government, under Adityanath's own leadership, withdrew the case in 2017. A subsequent High Court ruling upheld the withdrawal, citing procedural flaws in challenging the government's decision.

Sources & References

Disclaimer: Information on this page is compiled from publicly available news reports and official records. All references to legal proceedings are alleged unless a final court verdict is explicitly stated. Report inaccuracies via the Contact page.