Case Overview
This case involved a political storm over a luxurious Hublot watch worn by Siddaramaiah, raising questions about its source and value. After initial controversy, he declared it as a public asset given by a friend and deposited it with the government. Complaints filed with the Lokayukta were subsequently dismissed.
Detailed Background
In 2016, then-Chief Minister Siddaramaiah found himself embroiled in a controversy when he was seen wearing a high-end Hublot watch, estimated to be worth over ₹70 lakh. This immediately sparked a political furor, with opposition parties, particularly the BJP and JD(S), questioning the source of the expensive timepiece and alleging that it was a bribe or an undisclosed gift. They demanded an investigation into how a Chief Minister, who often projected an image of austerity, could afford or justify such a luxury item. Initially, Siddaramaiah stated that the watch was a gift from a friend, Dr. Girish Chandra Varma, who was a non-resident Indian. However, the controversy escalated, leading to complaints being filed with the Karnataka Lokayukta, accusing him of accepting an undeclared gift and potential corruption. Faced with the mounting pressure and public scrutiny, Siddaramaiah eventually decided to declare the watch a state asset. In a televised event, he handed over the watch to the Speaker of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly, effectively donating it to the state. He maintained that he had done nothing wrong and that his intention was to put an end to the political controversy surrounding the watch. Following this action, the complaints filed with the Lokayukta were subsequently dismissed, as the watch was no longer considered a private asset but rather a public donation. While no formal charges of corruption were proven, the 'Hublot Watch Controversy' became a notable incident during his tenure.
Charges / Allegations
Allegations regarding the ownership and receipt of a high-value Hublot watch, raising questions about its source and whether it was an undisclosed gift.
Current Status / Outcome
Siddaramaiah declared the watch as a public asset and handed it over to the state, following which complaints were eventually dismissed.
Sources & References
Disclaimer: Information on this page is compiled from publicly available news reports and official records. All references to legal proceedings are alleged unless a final court verdict is explicitly stated. Report inaccuracies via the Contact page.
